Landmark

This case study focuses on evaluating the user experience of Landmark Cinemas, a well-known Canadian cinema chain. It employs interviews and various metrics to assess the Landmark website. The goal of the study is to address user challenges by providing design solutions that identify and resolve user pain points.

Role

  • UI Design
  • Information Architecture
  • User Research

Deliverables

  • User Study
  • Wireframes
  • Solutions

Tools

  • Figma

Brand Background

cinema

Acquired in December 2017 by Kinepolis Group NV, Landmark is Canada's second-largest cinema company with 39 locations and 317 screens.

Landmark Cinemas offers diverse movie experiences, including Laser Ultra, RealD 3D, IMAX®, Extra, and Xtreme screens. Some locations provide premium comforts like Premiere or Full-Recliner Seating, with free reserved seating.

In response to the growing demand for online movie ticket purchases, Landmark Cinemas has launched two platforms: the official website and mobile app. They allow users to browse movie listings, check showtimes, and view available seats at specific locations.

Problems

Despite its intention to provide users with a convenient platform for activities such as viewing movie details and purchasing tickets, the Landmark website has faced significant business challenges.

To address these issues, our team conducted thorough user research to pinpoint specific pain points in Landmark's user experience and interface design. Based on our findings, we have developed actionable solutions to rectify these concerns and improve the overall user experience.

  • 01
    High bounce rates on landing page
  • 02
    Low conversion rate for online ticket sales

Note: A fictitious scenario has been used for the purpose of this case study.

Goals

The primary objective of this UX case study is to identify practical solutions that can effectively address the issues of the high bounce rates on the landing page and the low conversion rate for online ticket sales on the Landmark Cinemas website.

Key Hypotheses

Based on the business problems identified, we came up with 3 key hypotheses to test:

  1. The extensive options in the main navigation may overwhelm users' cognitive load, impeding their ability to efficiently accomplish their goals.
  2. Users seeking a particular movie would experience frustration due to the absence of a search feature, filters, and facets.
  3. The cluttered showtimes & tickets section could potentially cause users to exit the website without selecting a movie.
Participants

We had a pool of 15 people who filled in screening questionnaires, and based on their responses, such as availability for testing and experiences with the Landmark website, we selected four participants. These four participants had diverse backgrounds, experiences, and other characteristics.

Method

The user studies involved in-person testing conducted under moderation, with simultaneous recording via Zoom. Moderators followed pre-created task cards to guide participants through a series of tasks and questions pertaining to the Landmark website. Towards the end of the study, participants were requested to complete a SUS questionnaire regarding the website.

After each session, two observers reviewed the recordings of each user, taking notes on the study and highlighting common observations. The main objective of these observations was to identify patterns in user behavior and validate or invalidate the hypotheses.

Task Cards

Task 1

Task 1 aimed to gather insights into participants' perceptions and interactions with Landmark's landing page. In the first step, participants underwent a blink test, comparing Landmark's landing page with that of its main competitor, Cineplex. They provided impressions of both pages and selected their preferred option.

Step 2 involved participants reviewing Cineplex's landing page and indicating their preference. In step 3, participants were tasked with finding movie options for a specific date and location on Landmark's landing page. Moving on to step 4, participants were asked to locate a 3D movie after setting the desired location and date.

Observations

Users find the Landmark website to be cluttered and busy.
Users perceive the landing page as outdated.
Users unintentionally scrolls past the desired location when using the dropdown menu to select theatre location.
Users express confusion and find most of the icons on the website unclear and lacking meaning.
Users have a preference for the Cineplex website over Landmark.
Users appreciate the prominently displayed large movie posters on the Cineplex home page.

Task 2

The second task was designed based on the screening question results. Participants were asked to identify the most important factors when selecting a movie and theatre. The top responses were location, price, movie selection, and genre/cast/director. The task aimed to assess if the website provided easy access to these information.

The task consisted of three steps. In the first step, participants were required to locate a specific movie and retrieve detailed information about it. In the second step, participants had to find a movie trailer. The final step involved finding the ticket price, which could be accessed by clicking on the location under the showtime section.

Observations

The distinction between the "Now Playing" and "Coming Soon" tabs was not clear enough for users.
Users perceive the landing page as outdated.
Users expressed frustration and a desire for a search function to easily find specific movies.
The price information was not located where users expected it to be.
Users encountered difficulty in locating the page that displayed pricing information.

Task 3

Task 3 was designed to compare how users would locate a specific movie on the Landmark website compared to the Cineplex website, determine their preference between the two, and understand the reasons behind their preference.

In the first step, participants were asked to find a specific movie on the Landmark website, even though it was not currently showing but scheduled for release in the near future. In step 2 of the task, participants were then asked to locate the same movie on Cineplex's website.

Observations

Out of the four users, two were unable to complete the task successfully.
Users had to navigate through multiple pages to accomplish the goal.
Three out of four users indicated a high likelihood of using Google to search for the movie instead.
On Cineplex website, users utilized the search feature to find the desired movie.
Users expressed a preference for the Cineplex website due to the availability of the search feature.
System Usability Scale

By utilizing the System Usability Scale (SUS), we were able to gain a deeper understanding of the participants' experiences and satisfaction levels with the Landmark website.

While participants who were more familiar with using the theatre website achieved higher SUS scores, the majority still expressed dissatisfaction with its usability. Consequently, the website received an average SUS score of 25 and a detractor Net Promoter Score (NPS), indicating room for improvement in enhancing the overall user experience.

sus score
Key Findings

Based on the user study conducted, there were 3 significant findings that emerged consistently from all participants. These takeaways provide valuable insights into the user experience and highlight areas that require attention and improvement.

  1. Users expressed difficulties in navigating the Landmark website due to unclear navigation labels and disorganized content structure.
  2. Users encountered challenges when attempting to find a specific movie and select a location using the drop-down menu.
  3. Users found the Landmark website to be cluttered and overwhelming, which made it difficult to browse and access information about available movies.
Recommendations

Drawing from key insights gathered during the analysis, we have devised targeted and effective solutions to address the problematic areas within the website.

Final Redesign

During our usability test of the Landmark website, we discovered several noteworthy issues related to search and navigation, information architecture, categorization, and the overall user interface. In response to these problems, we have undertaken a redesign of Landmark's website to resolve these issues, as they were causing confusion among our test participants and impeding their ability to accomplish essential tasks. Some of the key challenges faced by users included:

  • Searching for a specific movie
  • Locating information such as tickets, pricing, showtimes, and location
  • Navigating the website using the primary navigation

What I learned

The Landmark case study provided me with valuable insights into user experience design. Firstly, I understood the importance of being cautious when utilizing icons or graphics to convey information since different users may interpret them differently. For effective communication on a website, clear and familiar labels play a crucial role.

Another important lesson I learned is the significance of choosing appropriate interactive elements based on the context. For example, when there are an extensive array of options to choose from, a drop-down menu can be overwhelming for users, making a search function a more suitable alternative.

Lastly, I gained an understanding of the significance of a well-structured information architecture. A robust information architecture facilitates easy navigation and interaction with the web interface, preventing users from getting lost or confused, which was a challenge faced by Landmark's website due to its vague information hierarchy.

View Other Projects: